To be honest, I’ve only ever used a wiki for
collaboration once. It was in a class for my Master’s program. I know it’s the
politically incorrect thing to say, especially in today’s technologically
dependent world, but I absolutely hated it. My teammates and I were putting
together a pathfinder as an assignment. The wiki had several pages that
included lists of various web resources a teacher or student might access if
they were looking for information on a specific topic. The topic we chose was
world myths, fables and the like. The biggest problem we encountered with the
wiki is that one of its biggest benefits was also its biggest drawback. Let me
explain. Wikis are supposed to be great because they are essentially webpages
that can be accessed and edited by anyone who has permissions to do so. It’s a
great idea in theory because it means that people who are working on a project,
like we were, don’t have to be in the same room to make changes to the project.
The problem with our wiki in particular was timing. If two people were on the
wiki at the same time making changes, it threw the whole thing out of whack.
Saved information vanished without a trace and formatting seemed to have a mind
of its own. We had decided everything would be in Times New Roman font with
details being 12 point and headers being 14 point. Anytime someone added
something to the wiki, the fonts and spacing of items posted by someone else on
the page would change. I lost count of how many times I had to re-format our
text. By the end of the project, we had given up trying to make the wiki
uniform in formatting, which bugged the heck out of me considering my undergrad
was in print journalism.
Despite the headaches I had in that one experience,
I do not plan to write wikis off. I still think they are valuable tools with a
lot of options for use in education and the library media center. Wikis can
serve as a great way to get students more involved with the media center. A
media specialist could use a wiki to set up a place where students can discuss
and review books they’ve read and movies they’ve seen. Students could use the
wiki to make recommendations to their peers and to find books they may be
interested in. Wikis are a good, free way to promote the media center as well.
The media specialist could easily create a wiki to serve as the library’s
website. There are many advantages to this. For one, it can be edited by the
media specialist and anyone he or she gives permissions to. Secondly, wikis
don’t really require any technical website design knowledge. Therefore, you
don’t have to know or even understand coding and HTML in order to create a wiki
site.
Another neat feature of the wiki is that users can see what recent
changes have been made and when they were made. Also, it’s usually pretty easy
to revert back to earlier versions if you need to. Wikis can include many types
of media, such as images, sound, and video, which would make the site more
attractive to its audience. Doing so will help enhance the wiki and elevate it
from internet storage cabinet of internet links and ideas to a living,
breathing website. Adding capabilities for visitors to comment, make
suggestions or add their own two cents on things can also make the wiki a more
collaborative tool.
In my research of wikis, I found there is also
another good use for them that has little to do with student usage. As one
author points out, wikis can also serve as great tools for internal communications.
(Boeninger, 2007, p. 26) The author notes wikis have several advantages “over
e-mail lists, blogs, network drives.” (Boeninger, 2007, p. 27) The biggest perk
is that wikis cab be accessed by any computer with an internet connection. The
author adds that added content is immediately searchable on a wiki and can be
found by searching keyword, as opposed to with blogs where results are usually
listed in reverse chronological order.
Creating wikis for use in the media center, and also
for use by classes for specific units is a great way to promote collaboration.
It’s also an easy and inexpensive way to communicate ideas with a wide
audience.
However, I think it’s important to note, there’s a difference between
creating your own wiki and using a wiki found online for information. As a
journalist and future media specialist, I think I must mention that wikis do
not necessarily make for good research sources. Wikipedia is an excellent
example. It’s great because it’s an online encyclopedia that’s free, easily
accessible, and constantly being updated by people, often time experts in a
particular field. The down side is that too often, it includes bad or wrong information.
As a journalist, I’ve seen many times before that someone will update a
celebrity’s Wikipedia page to say the celebrity has died, even though it’s not
true. Those who are not familiar with how Wikipedia functions will see the
information and believe it to be true, passing it on through Twitter and
Facebook. Suddenly, some news outlets that haven’t done their research are
reporting it. And don’t they look silly when it turns out that the person was
never dead to begin with? For this reason, at the new organization I work for,
we are specifically told not to consult Wikipedia when looking for information
to write stories. The problem with using Wikipedia, and potentially other
wikis, as sources is that you can never be certain the information is correct.
Even if the wiki belongs to a highly respected educational institution, you
would still want to be cautious about taking what’s said on the page as the
whole truth. It really depends on who authored the material, where their
information came from, and who has permissions to edit material on the wiki. You
would want to weigh the references listed and verify everything written on the
page. It is because of these credibility issues that I would advise students,
or anyone, not to go straight to Wikipedia for information. It may be a good
starting place for getting an idea, but it should never be used as an actual
source.
Here
are a few examples of neat wikis I stumbled upon while doing research on the
topic:
Here’s an example of how someone is using a wiki for
a book club.
Here’s an example I found of a media center wiki
that has a ton of resources that readers might find interesting.
Reference:
Boeninger,
C. F. (2007). The wonderful world of wikis: Applications for libraries. In N.
Courtney (Ed.), Library 2.0 and beyond. (pp.
25-33). Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
Shanna,
ReplyDeleteThanks for sharing your experience with the wiki. My only experiences have been through UWG. Our wiki for the class is a first for me. I have created a wiki for my own personal assignments, but never to share. I can see where the issue you had where members were working at the same time would be frustrating.
Your perspective as a journalist is interesting. I agree that wikis do not make good research sources. Many students do not realize this and should be taught why they are not credible sources for research papers. I teach online for the University of Phoenix in their Master’s program for Early Childhood Education students. Each time I have a new class, I have to emphasize that while Wikipedia provides a plethora of information is not a reliable source for them to use for their research papers. Most are not even aware of what a wiki is and the fact that it can be edited.
While this presents some drawbacks to using wikis, I fully believe they have their place in the educational setting and should be explored and promoted. I searched online for wikis in elementary settings and found some great, yet simple, ways to get kids collaborating and sharing with each other. This was one of my favorites - http://monsonclassroom.wikispaces.com.
Shanna, I feel your wiki pain! Our group had the same sort of issues when editing our wiki – It almost felt like we should have created a planner/calendar with the wiki so we could claim it as “ours” for editing purposes. That “recent edits” tab came in mighty handy. Not just to see what had already been done, but to know when it was ok to edit the wiki. (I learned to check “recent edits” before I started making changes. If the time stamp was anywhere close to the current time, I left and came back later!)
ReplyDeleteI’m glad you noted the “difference between creating your own wiki and using a wiki found online for information.” Knowing what a wiki is in the first place should make the user more vigilant about its contents. (We have to repeatedly remind our students that Wikipedia should not be used for scholarly research. We do tell them if they’re just curious and wanting to know something, ok, but it may or may not be accurate; for school work and research, look elsewhere.)
Perhaps because I work with elementary students, I am wary of using wikis. As it is, the students have managed to delete student/teacher/class documents/folders from the school network; I wonder what they’d do to their peers’ work when given intentional editing ability. Though the example you gave for a wiki for a book club sounds intriguing. Perhaps trying out a wiki with a select group will pave the way for future wiki use…
Shanna,
ReplyDeleteI loved your examples of the wikis you thought we may find useful, because it showcases a few different ways wikis can be used. I have never had to create a wiki but I understand your frustration. For some reason, I feel very overwhlemed when introduced to a new technology and when it does not work the way I assume it should, I get frustrated. Reading your experience let me know that I am not alone in my feelings.
I agree with your uncertainty in the validity of the information posted on many wiki pages, and encourage media specialist to teach students the proper way to fact find, and discover information. I think that wikis source for information sharing as well as a great tool that can be used to help students become independent learners.
First off, nice title! Secondly, your first paragraph is almost my exact sentiments about wikis. I do not like them, well at least the one we used for the Pathfinders. I had the same problems as you with things moving around or problems I had when I needed to add something and other things would disappear causing me to freak out and think I ruined it for everyone! I am not a fan, but like you, I do see it's uses.
ReplyDeleteI like your idea about used wikis as a book review space for students. That could be a great way to get students involved, but I wonder what else they would write on there and who would get access to use the wiki. I know in my school, there are some students I would dare allow to be anywhere near a type of commincation where they can type what they want. I know them very well and know just the kind of things they would do. So that would worry me with a library wiki that is open to all students. Maybe a student library club or commity could be the ones to write the reviews or to interview students about books and relay the information on the wiki. That may solve the problem of who has access to the wiki.
You make a good point about the validity of online wikis such as Wikipedia. I've heard many stories of how the site is being misused and the damage it can cause, but on the other hand, there can be some correct and valuable information there. As media specialist, we would just have to make sure that information found on site like that by students need to be compared to other informational site on the same subject to see if they coincide.
Overall, thanks for your post. I think you put a lot of good thoughts about wikis and make others, like myself, feel like we aren't the only ones with no clue!
Shanna, I really enjoyed your post on wikis. I have to be honest as well and say that I have never gotten involved with wikis. I was always told that they were not reliable and that anyone could go and alter information. They could post information that was not correct. I have always taught my students to not use wikis as a main reference or source because of the reasons I listed above. However, through this course I am seeing ways that wikis can be used. I love the example cite you shared that shows how wikis can be used with a book club. This is something I will definitely look into with my students in the media center.
ReplyDelete